1. patent's resources or methods are shown to public, and criterions of patents on bm are very strict. so actually, it is impossible that infringe the patent by chance. moreover, bm patents are not given to someone by methods itself. therefore, there is no problem at all.

2. BM patent is related to tangible goods. But, this opinion reduces scope of BM patent. BM patent is not just limited field of Ad as opinion of group3 but connected with the IT industry which is important in these days. In this industry, because BM is ‘goods’itself, we should prevent BM from pirating.

3. In case of restricting only the manufacturing industry, getting less option because of the exclusive possession is so easy to predict  but actually bm patent is one of the business methods including an concrete IT technology such as a ideal.
because only an capital and ideal excluding an invisible trade do business in the service if we approve business methods patent we can encourage invention and also have promoted convenience and enlargement of options for consumers.

이거 1,2,3 문단별로 각각 중심문장 하나두개로 만들어라는데 솔직히 다 읽어보면 전부 중심내용인거 같아서 추릴수가 없네요 ㅡㅡ;;

BM 특허 관련 지식에 완전 빠삭한것도 아니고 그냥 번역해보니까 다 중요한 내용 같아서 ㅠㅠ 잘 아시는분 한두문장 요약좀 해주세요..